Profil ketahanan akademik siswa di tengah arus tantangan revolusi industri 4.0

Fadhil Muhammad

Abstract


Tantangan terbesar yang dialami oleh siswa dalam perkembangan revolusi industri 4.0 di Indonesia saat ini adalah kemampuan siswa untuk menghadapi tuntutan akademik. Perubahan budaya akademik, pembaruan sistem kurikulum yang relatif cepat, kegelisahan dan kebingungan dalam menentukan karir adalah serangkaian tuntutan akademik di era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Berbagai tuntutan dan tantangan akademis berpotensi menyebabkan tekanan akademik di kalangan siswa yang cenderung berdampak negatif pada pola belajar siswa dan perkembangan psikologis siswa di sekolah. Adapun artikel ini bertujuan untuk menggambarkan profil ketahanan akademik siswa di unit pendidikan formal, yang berfokus pada ruang lingkup dan batas-batasannya. Oleh karena itu, artikel ini diharapkan dapat berkontribusi secara  praktis dan teoritis di dunia pendidikan, terutama studi yang terlibat dalam layanan bimbingan dan konseling di sekolah.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Benishek, L., Feldman, J., Shipon, W., Mecham, S., & Lopez, F. (2005). Development and evaluation of the revised academic hardiness scale. Journal of Career Assessment, 13, 59–76. DOI: 10.1177/1069072704270274

Benishek, L., & Lopez, F. (2001). Development and initial validation of academic hardiness scale. Journal o fCareer Assessment,9,333–352. http: // journals. sagepub. com/doi/pdf/10. 1177/106907270100900402

Creed, P., Conlon, E., & Dhaliwal, K. (2013). Revisiting the academic hardiness scale: Revision and revalidation. Journal of Career Assessment, 21(4), 537–554, doi: 10.1177/1069072712475285.

Gibbons, C. (2015). Stress, eustress and the national student survey. Psychology of Teaching Review, 21(2), 86–91.

Kamtsios, S., & Karagiannopoulou, E. (2015). Exploring relationships between academic hardiness, academic stressors and achievement in university undergraduates. Journal of Applied Educational and Policy Research, 1(1), 53–73.

Karimi, A., & Venkatesan, S. (2009). Mathematics anxiety,mathematics performance and academic hardiness in high school students. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 1(1), 33–37.

Kobasa S.C. (1979). Stressful life events, personality, and health- Inquiry into hardiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 37 (01): 1-11.

Kobasa, S. C. (1979a). Personality and resistance to illness. American Journal of Community Psychology, 7, 413–423. doi: 10.1007/BF00894383;

Kobasa, S. C. (1979b). Stressful life events, personality, and health: An inquiry into hardiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1–11. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.1.1.

Komalasari, Gantina. (2011). Teori dan Teknik Konseling. Jakarta: Indeks.

Lifton, D., Seay, S.,Mc Carly, N., Olive-Taylor, R., Seeger, R., & Bigbee, D. (2006). Correlating hardiness with graduation persistence. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 10, 277–283. Retrieved from http://rapidintellect. com/AEQweb.

Maddi, S. (2005). On hardiness and other pathways to resilience. American Psychologist, 60(3), 261–272.

Maddi, S., Khoshaba, D., Jensen, K., Carter, E., Lu, J., & Harvey, R. (2002). Hardiness training for high-risk undergraduates. NACADA Journal, 22, 45–55. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12930/0271-9517-22.1.4

Maddi, S., R., & Khosaba. D., M. (2005). Risilience at Work. New York: American Managemen Association.

Tyrrel, J. (1992). Sources of stress among psychology undergraduates. Irish Journal of Psychology, 13, 184–192.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


P-ISSN: 2407-5809

E-ISSN: 2714-5484

Diterbitkan Oleh:

Jurusan Bimbingan dan Konseling 

Universitas Syiah Kuala