YouTube teaching materials with peer support to improve students' mastery of subject content learning

Asnawi Muslem, Rosnani Sahardin, Hendra Heriansyah, Ika Apriani Fata, Yulianti Djalaluddin, Emma Hankinson

Abstract


This study investigated the effectiveness of using YouTube teaching materials with peer support on students’ mastery of subject content learning, motivation, obstacles, and benefits they acquired in learning through this media. This study involved 60 undergraduate students attending the English Language Teaching Method Course (ELTMC) at a university in Banda Aceh, Indonesia. The study used mixed methods: quantitative and qualitative. A quasi-experimental with pre-test and post-test design was used to see the effectiveness of using YouTube teaching materials with peer support and without peer support on students’ mastery of the course. The instruments used to collect the data were tests and an open-ended questionnaire. The findings revealed that using YouTube teaching materials with peer support significantly improved students’ mastery of the subject content of ELTMC compared to those without peer support. The study also reported that only 13 of 30 students had problems learning the subject via the media in the experimental group with peer support. The problems were the speed of speaking by the native speakers, lengthy videos, different English accents that were difficult to absorb, and unclear video sounds. Meanwhile, the benefits include the presence of the native speakers in the videos who are creative and accurate in the language being learned (i.e., English), the joy and positive challenges they got from watching the videos and having discussions afterward with peers. The availability of peer assistance enabled students to comprehend the teaching material delivered through actual media on YouTube on a deeper level.

Keywords


authentic media; English language; peer support; teaching method; YouTube

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alfarwan, S. (2019). University student access to and use electronic devices: A latent English language learning potential. Teaching English with Technology, 19(1), 102-117.

Almurashi, W. A. (2016). The effective use of YouTube videos for teaching English language in classrooms as supplementary material at Taibah University in Alula. International Journal of English Language and Linguistics Research, 4(3), 32-47.

Alshumaimeri, Y. A. (2015). Using material authenticity in the Saudi English textbook design: A content analysis from the viewpoint of EFL teachers. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.6n.2p.229

Annamalai, N. (2015). Using Whatsapp to extend learning. Teaching English with Technology, 19(1), 3-20.

Arkkelin, D. (2014). Using SPSS to understand research and data analysis. Valparaiso University. https://scholar.valpo.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=psych_oer

Berk, R. (2009). Multimedia teaching with video clips: TV, movies, YouTube, and mtvU in the college classroom. International Journal of Technology in Teaching & Learning, 5(1), 1-21.

Bold, C. (2008). Peer support groups: Fostering a deeper approach to learning through critical reflection on practice. Reflective Practice, 9(3), 257-267. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623940802207022

Brame, C. J. (2016). Effective educational videos: Principles and guidelines for maximizing student learning from video content. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(4): 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-03-0125

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Burke, A. S., & Fedorek, B. (2017). Does “flipping” promote engagement?: A comparison of a traditional, online, and flipped class. Active Learning in Higher Education, 18(1), 11-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417693487

Carter, E. W., Moss, C. K., Asmus, J., Fesperman, E., Cooney, M., Brock, M. E., Lyons, G., Huber, H. B., & Vincent, L. B. (2015). Promoting inclusion, social connections, and learning through peer support arrangements. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 48(1), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059915594784

Chu, R. J., & Chu, A. Z. (2010). Multi-level analysis of peer support, Internet self-efficacy and e-learning outcomes - The contextual effects of collectivism and group potency. Computers and Education, 55(1), 145-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.011

De Guerrero, M. C. M., & Villamil, O. S. (2000). Activating the ZPD: Mutual scaffolding in L2 peer revision. The Modern Language Journal, 84(1), 51-68. https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00052

Dunn, P. K., Richardson, A., Oprescu, F., & McDonald, C. (2013). Mobile-phone-based classroom response systems: Students’ perceptions of engagement and learning in a large undergraduate course. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 44(8), 1160-1174. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2012.756548

Ertmer, P. A., Richardson, J. C., Belland, B., Camin, D., Connolly, P., Coulthard, G., Lei, K., & Mong, C. (2007). Using peer feedback to enhance the quality of online student postings: An exploratory study. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(2), 412-433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00331.x

Fleck, B. K. B., Beckman, L. M., Sterns, J. L., & Hussey, H. D. (2014). YouTube in the classroom: Helpful tips and student perceptions. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 14(3), 21-37.

Gardner, R. C. (2010). Motivation and second language acquisition: The socio-educational model. Peter Lang Publishing.

Grgurovic, M., & Hegelheimer, V. (2007). Help options and multimedia listening: Students’ use of subtitles and the transcript. Language Learning & Technology, 11(1), 45-66.

Hussin, R. A., Gani, S. A., & Muslem, A. (2020). The use of YouTube media through group discussion in teaching speaking. English Education Journal, 11(1), 19-33.

Ivone, F. M., Jacobs, G. M., & Renandya, W. A. (2020). Far apart, yet close together: Cooperative learning in online education. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(2), 271-289. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i2.17285

Keiler, L. S. (2018). Teachers’ roles and identities in student-centered classrooms. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(34), 1-20.

Klobas, J. E., McGill, T. J., Moghavvemi, S., & Paramanathan, T. (2018). Compulsive YouTube usage: A comparison of use motivation and personality effects. Computers in Human Behavior, 87(February), 129-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.038

Marhamah, F., Muslem, A., & Marhaban, S. (2022). An investigation on using teaching media in teaching speaking skill. English Education Journal, 13(1), 32-45. https://doi.org/10.24815/eej.v13i1.23147

Martin, H. J. (2010). Workplace climate and peer support as determinants of training transfer. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 21(1), 87-104. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.20038

Masgoret, A. M., & Gardner, R. C. (2003). Attitudes, motivation, and second language learning: A meta-analysis of studies conducted by Gardner and associates. Language Learning, 53(SUPPL. 1), 167-210. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00227

Mitcham, C. (1987). Responsibility and technology: The expanding relationship. In P. T. Durbin (Ed.), Technology and responsibility (pp. 3-39). D. Reidel Publishing Company.

Muslem, A., Zulfikar, T., Ibrahim, I. H., Syamaun, A., & Usman, B. (2019). The impact of immersive strategy with English video clips on EFL students’ speaking performance. Teaching English with Technology, 19(4), 90-103.

Oddone, C. (2011). Using videos from YouTube and websites in the CLIL classroom. Studies about Languages, 0(18), 105-110. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.sal.0.18.417

Oletic, A., & Ilic, N. (2006). Intrinsic Motivation, Extrinsic Motivation, and Learning English As a Foreign Language. Psychological Reports, 99(7), 813.

Pasaribu, T. A. (2020). Challenging EFL students to read: Digital reader response tasks foster learner autonomy. Teaching English with Technology, 20(2), 21-41.

Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (Eds.). (2002). Methodology in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020

Sevy-Biloon, J., & Chroman, T. (2019). Authentic use of technology improves EFL communication and motivation through international language exchange video chat. Teaching English with Technology, 19(2), 44-58.

Terantino, J. M. (2011). YouTube for foreign languages: You have to see this video. Language Learning & Technology, 15(1), 10-16. http://dx.doi.org/10125/44231

Thomas, K., & Muñoz, M. (2016). Hold the phone! High school students’perceptions of mobile phone integration in the classroom. American Secondary Education, 44(3), 19-37.

Tri, D. H., & Nguyen, N. H. T. (2014). An exploratory study of ICT use in the English language. Teaching English with Technology, 14(4), 32-46.

Visser, M. (2005). Implementing peer support in secondary schools: facing the challenges. South African Journal of Education, 25(3)148-155.

Watkins, J., & Wilkins, M. (2011). Using YouTube in the EFL classroom. Language Education in Asia, 2(1), 113-119.

Yudhiantara, R., & Nasir, I. A. (2017). Toward Mobile-Assisted Language Learning (MALL): Reaping mobile phone benefits in classroom activities. Register Journal, 10(1), 12-28. https://doi.org/10.18326/rgt.v10i1.813

Züll, C. (2016). Open-ended questions: GESIS survey guidelines. GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.15465/gesis-sg_en_002




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v9i2.25236

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Print ISSN: 2355-2794, Online ISSN: 2461-0275

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.