Speech acts and language styles of Biden’s victory speech for promoting peace values

Fitri Rahmawati Astiandani, Slamet Setiawan, Ali Mustofa

Abstract


The importance of language in expressing ideas and ideologies has always been a focus of public debate in politics. The persons in charge of the reins of power become a source of concern, as well as the language they use. As a result, this research looks into the speech acts, language styles, and how they express peace values from Biden’s victory speech. A qualitative research design was used. Biden’s pragma stylistics and peace values were extracted from his victory speech in Wilmington, Delaware on November 7, 2020. This study focused on three aspects, namely: categories of illocutionary acts, language style based on sentence structure, and peace values. The data were analyzed following these stages: data condensation, data display, and drawing/verifying conclusions. The results showed that the most common illocutionary type employed in diverse language styles in Biden’s victory speech was commissive. Presumably, politicians have become accustomed to making promises or making commitments in order to entice citizens to vote for them. In addition, two types of peace values (inner peace and social peace) were discovered along with three types of language styles: parallelism, antithesis, and repetition (epizeuxis, anaphora, and anadiplosis), with more than half of the data employing parallelism as the language style. The majority of Biden’s speech focused on social peace to keep social life free of internal strife. 


Keywords


Biden’s speech; EFL learning context; language styles; peace values; speech acts

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abuya, E. J. (2012). A pragma-stylistic analysis of President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan’s inaugural speech. English Language Teaching, 5(11), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n11p8

Al-Ameedi, R. T., & Mukhef, R. N. (2017). Aspects of political language and parallelism. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(34), 185–200.

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.

Baby, S., Afzal, U., & Basharat, Z. (2020). Pragmatic analysis of Joe Biden’s victory speech 2020. PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 17(8), 1148–1158.

Balasooriya, A. S. (2001). Learning the way of peace: A teachers’ guide to peace education. UNESCO.

Beard, A. (2001). The language of politics. Routledge.

Belle, H. van (2009). Playing with oppositions: Verbal and visual antithesis in the media. In: J. Ritola (Ed.), Argument Cultures: Proceedings of OSSA 09 (pp. 1-13). OSSA.

Darong, H. C. (2021). Interpersonal function of Joe Biden’s victory speech (systemic functional linguistics view). Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation, 5(1), 57–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jere.v5i1.31420

Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.

Farneubun, P. K. (2013). Understanding Christian’s perspective on peace and war. Jurnal Ilmiah Hubungan Internasional, 9(2), 105-115.

Ghani, N. A., & Hussain, M. S. (2021). Application of Fairclough’s model on Joe Biden’s victory speech: Corpus assisted analysis of New US vision versus world voices. Psychology and Education, 58(2), 10168–10181.

Hanks, P. (2018). Types of speech acts. In D. Fogal, D. W. Harris, & M. Moss (Eds.), New Work of speech acts (p. 123-143). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198738831.003.0005

Hashim, S. S. M. (2015). Speech acts in political speeches. Journal of Modern Education Review, 5(7), 699-706. https://doi.org/10.15341/jmer(2155-7993)/07.05.2015/008

Jones, R. G. (2016). Communication in the real world: An introduction to communication studies. University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing. https://doi.org/10.24926/8668.0401

Jufri, J. (2016). Teaching speaking and writing at junior and senior high schools as demanded by curriculum 2013. Lingua Didaktika: Jurnal Bahasa dan Pembelajaran Bahasa, 10(1), 60–73. https://doi.org/10.24036/ld.v10i1.6329

Kamelia, K. (2019). Using video as media of teaching in English language classroom: expressing congratulation and hopes. Utamax: Journal of Ultimate Research and Trends in Education, 1(1), 34–38. https://doi.org/10.31849/utamax.v1i1.2742

Keraf, G. (2006). Diksi dan gaya bahasa (16th ed.). PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Kulo, L. (2009). Linguistic features in political speeches: How language can be used to impose certain moral or ethical values on people. Lulea University of Technology.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Nurhadi, J. (2016). Utilization of pragma-stylistics strategies in learning context for communicating global peace. Jurnal Politikom Indonesiana, 1(2), 106–116.

Ondondo, E. A. (2015). Acquired language disorders as barriers to effective communication. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(7), 1324. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0507.02

Online Cambridge Dictionary. (2020). https://dictionary.cambridge.org/

Ricca, H., & Johan, M. (2021). Deixis found in the first victory speech of Joe Biden as United States President. Science Humanity Journal, 1(2), 83–90.

Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.

Searle, J. R. (2002). Studies in linguistics and philosophy. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Susilawati, S., Wahdini, E., & Hadi, S. (2019). Implementation of early childhood character education in the 2013 curriculum. Journal of K6, Education, and Management, 2(3), 193–203. http://dx.doi.org/10.11594/jk6em.02.03.03

Taiwo, R. O. (2008). Legitimization and coercion in political discourse: A case study of Olusegun Obasanjo address to the PDP elders and stakeholders forum. Issues in Political Discourse Analysis, 2(2), 191–205.

Tan, B. P., Naidu, N. B. M., & Jamil, Z. (2017). Moral values and good citizens in a multi-ethnic society: A content analysis of moral education textbooks in Malaysia. Journal of Social Studies Research, 42(2), 119-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2017.05.004

Waheeb, K. A. (2017). A pragmatic-stylistic approach to the study of dramatic texts. Journal of University of Babylon, 25(5), 2121–2131.

Young, D. J. (2009). Writing from the core: A guide for writing. Professor Textbook.

Zahri, A. (2018). Gender representation in Indonesia EFL textbook exercise [Bachelor’s thesis, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry]. Repository of UIN Ar-Raniry. https://repository.ar-raniry.ac.id/id/eprint/3261




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v9i2.23047

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Print ISSN: 2355-2794, Online ISSN: 2461-0275

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.