The effectiveness of an instructional guide on Chinese pre-service EFL teachers’ knowledge in teaching phonics

Minjie Chen, Hock Seng Goh, Ruey Shing Soo, Guojie Yin

Abstract


In China, phonics instruction has been given substantial emphasis ever since the implementation of the 2011 National English Curriculum for Compulsory Education. However, many Chinese students’ learning outcome remains unsatisfactory due to EFL teachers’ insufficient knowledge to teach phonics and the absence of a phonics instructional guide. To address this gap, this study aims to investigate the effects of a newly developed phonics instructional guide on Chinese pre-service EFL teachers’ knowledge base to teach phonics. Adopting an experimental research design, the study was conducted at a teachers’ college in Sichuan Province, China. There were 172 pre-service EFL teachers assigned into two equivalent groups, namely the experimental group (N=86) and control group (N=86), who took a test respectively before and after the intervention. The measures of the test included seven dimensions aiming to elicit knowledge of general phonics, phonetic system, phonemic awareness, phonics decoding rules, phonics instructions, reinforcement methods, and sight word instructions. The experimental group participants undertook a 15-hour phonics training course using the newly developed Phonics Instructional Guide (PHOInG). The control group participants were taught using a conventional method involving the use of an English textbook prescribed by the college. Results revealed that the Chinese pre-service EFL teachers in the experimental group improved significantly in their overall knowledge base of English phonics and phonics instruction, except for phonemic awareness and knowledge of the phonetic system. These findings point to the importance of using a needs-based and theoretically informed instructional guide when providing phonics and phonics instruction training to Chinese EFL pre-service teachers.

Keywords


phonics instruction; pre-service EFL teachers; instructional guide; knowledge base

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amadi, E. A. (2019). Bottom-up theory and phonics instruction: Implications for beginning reading. European Journal of Applied Linguistics Studies, 1(2), 89-100.

Blevins, W. (2017). Phonics from A to Z: A practical guide (3rd ed.). Scholastic.

Brady, S., Gillis, M., Smith, T., Lavalette, M., Liss-Bronstein, L., Lowe, E., North, W., Russo, E., & Wilder, T. D. (2009). First grade teachers’ knowledge of phonological awareness and code concepts: Examining gains from an intensive form of professional development and corresponding teacher attitudes. Reading and Writing 22(4), 425-455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9166-x

Branch, R. M. (2018). Characteristics of foundational instructional design models. In A. R. Robert & V. D. John (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (4th ed., pp. 23-30). Pearson.

Budiman, A. (2017). Behaviourism in foreign language teaching methodology. English Franca, 1(2), 101-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.29240/ef.v1i2.171

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, D. J. (2018). Research design (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

El-Amin, A. (2020). Andragogy: A theory in practice in higher education. Journal of Research in Higher Education, 4(2), 54-69. http://doi.org/10.24193/JRHE.2020.2.4

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2011). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.

Gagné, R. M., Wager, W. W., Golas, K. C., & Keller, J. M. (2005). Principles of instructional design (5th ed.). Thomson Learning.

Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2009). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (9th ed.). Pearson Education.

Ghoneim, N. M. M., & Elghotmy, H. E. A. (2015). The effect of suggested. Multisensory phonics program on developing kindergarten pre-service teachers’ EFL reading accuracy and phonemic awareness. English Language Teaching, 8(12), 124-143. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n12p124

Gopal, R., & Mahmud, C. T. (2018). Miscue analysis: A glimpse into the reading process. Studies in English Language and Education, 5(1), 12-24. http://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v5il.9927

Gopal, R., & Singh, C. K. S. (2020). Arising reading patterns in understanding literary texts. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(2), 407-420. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i2.16663

He, S. Q. (2018). An empirical study of the impact of phonics on the reading and writing of English vocabulary in primary schools [Master’s thesis, Shanghai International Studies University]. China National Knowledge Infrastructure. https://kns.cnki.net/KNS8/Detail?sfield=fn&QueryID=28&CurRec=1&DbCode=CMFD&dbname=CMFD201802&filename=1018231078.nh

International Literacy Association. (2018). Explaining phonics instruction: An educator’s guide. https://literacyworldwide.org/docs/default-source/where-we-stand/ila-explaining-phonics-instruction-an-educators-guide.pdf

International Literacy Association. (2019). Meeting the challenges of early literacy phonics instruction. https://www.literacyworldwide.org/docs/default-source/where-we-stand/ila-meeting-challenges-early-literacy-phonics-instruction.pdf

Islam, M. H. (2015). Thorndike Theory and its application in learning. At-Ta’lim: Jurnal Pendidikan, 1(1), 37-47.

Iswati, L., & Triastuti, A. (2021). Voicing the challenges of ESP teaching: Lessons from ESP in non-English departments. Studies in English Language and Education, 8(1), 276-293. http://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v8i1.17301

Johnson, R. B., & Bendolph. A. (2018). Evaluation in instructional design: A comparison of the major evaluation models. In A. R. Robert & V. D. John (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (4th ed., pp. 87-96). Pearson.

Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2019). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed approaches (7th ed.). Sage Publications.

Knowles, M. S., Holton III, E. F., Swanson, R. A., Robinson, P. A. (2015). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (8th ed.). Routledge.

Kumar, R. (2019). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners (5th ed.). Sage Publications Ltd.

Liu, G. C. (2019). The effectiveness of phonics instruction in English vocabulary teaching at primary schools [Master’s thesis, Yunnan Normal University]. China National Knowledge Infrastructure. https://kns.cnki.net/KNS8/Detail?sfield=fn&QueryID=44&CurRec=2&DbCode=CMFD&dbname=CMFD202001&filename=1019922974.nh

Long, Y. H. (2019). On the current situation and countermeasures of applying phonics to English teaching of rural middle schools-Take Jiujiang Middle School of Shuangliu District in Chengdu for example [Master’s thesis, Sichuan Normal. University]. China National Knowledge Infrastructure. https://kns.cnki.net/KNS8/Detail?sfield=fn&QueryID=25&CurRec=6&DbCode=CMFD&dbname=CMFD202001&filename=1020015165.nh

Manchester Metropolitan University (2015). PGCE phonics and early reading training and professional training. Faculty of Education. https://www.mmu.ac.uk/media/mmuacuk/content/documents/primary-teacher-education/partnership/2015-16/school-based-training-documents/pgce/Teaching-Phonics-PGCE.pdf

Maruyama, G., & Deno, S. (Eds.). (1992). Research in educational settings. SAGE Publications. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412985680

McCoy, R. (2017). Phonics preparation in teacher education programs. The Kabod, 3(3), Article 7. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/kabod/vol3/iss3/7

McNamara, T. (2014). Language testing. Oxford University Press.

Ministry of Education. (2011). English curriculum for compulsory education. Beijing Normal University Publishing Group.

Morrison, G. R., Ross, M. S., Morrison, R. J., & Kalman, H. K. (2019). Designing effective instruction (8th ed.). Wiley.

Nafiah, U. (2020). Developing English modules with integrated Islamic values and Jambi local wisdom. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(1), 96-112. http://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7il.15138

Nasir, C., Gani, S. A., & Haqqini, D. (2019). Group investigation technique for better reading comprehension skill. Studies in English Language and Education, 6(2), 251-261. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v6i2.13619

Nation, I. S. P., & Macalister, J. (2010). Language curriculum design. Routledge.

Nazir, F. B. (2018). Stimulus-response theory: a case study in the teaching and learning of Malay language among year 1 pupils. The journal of Social Science Research, 4(10), 153-157. http://doi.org/10.32861/journal.7.2018.410.153.157

Phipps, B. (2011). A study of phonics instruction: Teaching phonics dance to at-risk elementary students to improve decoding skills. Centennial Library.

Reynolds, J. E. (2018, March 17). Implication of learning theories on instructional design. eLearning Industry. https://elearningindustry.com/learning-theories-instructional-design-implications

Robinson, J. M. (2018). Evaluation of teaching methods to improve reading performance of English language learners. Advancement of Educational Research International, 12(1), 25-33. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1209451

Schunk, D. H. (2020). Learning theories: An educational perspective (8th ed.). Pearson.

Spear-Swerling, L, Brucker, P. O., & Alfano, M. P. (2005). Teachers’ literacy related knowledge and self-perceptions in relation to preparation and experience. Annals of Dyslexia, 55(2), 266-296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-005-0014-7

Surdyanto, A., & Kurniawan, W. (2020). Developing critical reading module using Integrated Learning Content and Language Approach. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(1), 154-169. http://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i1.15098

Syamdianita, & Cahyono, B. Y. (2021). The EFL pre-service teachers’ experiences and challenges in designing teaching materials using TPACK framework. Studies in English Language and Education, 8(2), 561-577. http://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v8i2.19202

Tahir M. H. M., Shah, D. S. M., Shak, M. S. Y., Albakri, I. S. M. A., & Adnan, A. H. M. (2021). Explicit vocabulary instruction: Effects of vocabulary learning on Form Two ESL learners. Studies in English Language and Education, 8(3), 1227-1247. http://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v8i3.19539

Wajiha, M., Alam, S., Hassan, U., Zafar, T., Butt, R., Konain, S., & Rizvi, M. (2017). Difficulty index, discrimination index and distractor efficiency in multiple choice questions. Annals of PIMS, 13(4), 310-315.

Westerveld, M. F. & Barton, G. M. (2017). Enhancing phonological awareness and orthographic knowledge of preservice teachers: An intervention through online course work. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 42(12), 98-111. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2017v42n12.6

Yan, Y. W. (2018). A research on the problems and countermeasures of phonics in. primary school English teaching [Master’s thesis, Liao Cheng University]. China National Knowledge Infrastructure. https://kns.cnki.net/KNS8/Detail?sfield=fn&QueryID=14&CurRec=1&DbCode=CMFD&dbname=CMFD201802&filename=1018824601.nh

Zhang, Y. H. (2019). An empirical study on the introduction of primary school students’ English reading based on phonics [Master’s thesis, Shandong Normal University]. China National Knowledge Infrastructure. https://kns.cnki.net/KNS8/Detail?sfield=fn&QueryID=14&CurRec=3&DbCode=CMFD&dbname=CMFD201902&filename=1019118764.nh

Zhao, Z. Y. (2019). A Case study on primary school novice English teachers’ beliefs and practice about phonics instruction [Master’s thesis, Sichuan Normal. University]. China National Knowledge Infrastructure. https://kns.cnki.net/KNS8/Detail?sfield=fn&QueryID=23&CurRec=1&DbCode=CMFD&dbname=CMFD202001&filename=1019096998.nh

Zhong, W. X. (2020). A Study on the application of phonics in primary school English vocabulary teaching [Master’s thesis, Hunan Normal University]. China National Knowledge Infrastructure. https://kns.cnki.net/KNS8/Detail?sfield=fn&QueryID=2&CurRec=1&DbCode=CMFD&dbname=CMFD201701&filename=1016085684.nh

Zhong, B. & Kang, Y. (2021). Chinese EFL teachers’ perception and practice of phonics instruction. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 12(6), 990-999. http://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1206.15




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v9i2.22780

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Print ISSN: 2355-2794, Online ISSN: 2461-0275

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.