Synchronous web-based collaborative writing: Attitudes of learners toward working in pairs and small groups

Emil Fermin Ubaldo


This study explored learners’ attitudes toward collaborative writing in pairs and small groups (fours and sixes) in a synchronous web-based environment. Sophomore pre-service teachers in one intact class in the Philippines (n=31) completed the same collaborative writing tasks using Google Docs. In three separate out-of-class sessions, they first worked in pairs, and then they were assigned to either groups of four or groups of six in the succeeding two sessions. After completing the tasks, they were asked to complete a post-task questionnaire. The learners had an overall positive attitude toward peer collaborative writing in a web-based synchronous environment as it helps them to develop the content better, find appropriate vocabulary, and improve the grammatical and mechanical accuracy of the texts they produced. Students highly appreciated working in pairs and groups of four. In pairs, they felt that it is easier to manage text-chat deliberation, resolve concerns, and attend to each other’s suggestions. In groups of four, they acknowledged the increase of peer resources for knowledge sharing and in ensuring the accuracy of their language use. Hence, the majority complained that a group of six is not that conducive in a real-time text-chat environment. When asked about their preference, most students would prefer to work in a similar task and environment in pairs. These findings on learners’ attitudes toward collaborative writing concur with the previous literature in face-to-face educational settings and open new insights on synchronous web-based collaborative writing via text-chat.


collaborative writing; group writing; learners’ attitude; pair writing; synchronous online collaboration

Full Text:



Adams, R. J. (2007). Do second language learners benefit from interacting with each other? In A. Mackey (Ed.). Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 29-51). Oxford University Press.

Alexopoulou, E., & Driver, R. (1996). Small-group discussion in physics: Peer interaction modes in pairs and fours. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(10), 1099-1100.

Dobao, A. F. (2012). Collaborative writing tasks in the L2 classroom: Comparing group, pair, and individual work. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(1), 40-58.

Dobao, A. F. (2014a). Attention to form in collaborative writing tasks: Comparing pair and small group interaction. Canadian Modern Language Review,70(2), 158-187.

Dobao, A. F. (2014b). Vocabulary learning in collaborative tasks: A comparison of pair and small group work. Language Teaching Research, 18(4), 497-520.

Dobao, A. F. & Blum, A. (2013). Collaborative writing in pairs and small groups: Learners’ attitudes and perceptions. System, 41(2), 365-378.

Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.). Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33-56). Ablex Publishing.

Ishtaiwa, F. F., & Aburezeq, I. M. (2015). The impact of Google Docs on student collaboration: A UAE case study. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 7, 85-96.

Ivone, F. M., Jacobs, G. M., & Renandya, W. A. (2020). Far apart, yet close together: Cooperative learning in online education. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(2), 271-289.

Leyco, C. S. (2020, October 6). Filipinos pay more for slow Internet services - World Bank. Manila Bulletin.

Li, M., & Zhu, W. (2017). Good or bad collaborative wiki writing: Exploring links between group interactions and writing products. Journal of Second Language Writing, 35, 38-53.

Lorenzo, A. R. (2016). Effectiveness of the computer and internet literacy project in public high schools of Tarlac Province, Philippines. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 15(2), 38-46.

Manchon, R. M. (2011). Writing to learn the language: Issues in theory and research. In R. M. Manchon (Ed.). Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language (pp. 61-82). John Benjamins.

Noël, S., & Robert, J. M. (2004). Empirical study on collaborative writing: What do co-authors do, use, and like? Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 13(1), 63-89.

Ohta, A. S. (2000). Rethinking interaction in SLA: Developmentally appropriate assistance in the zone of proximal development and the acquisition of L2 grammar. In J. P Lantolf (Ed.). Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 51-78). Oxford University Press.

Oxford, R. L. (2011). Strategies for learning a second or foreign language. Language Teaching, 44(2), 167-180.

Rahayu, D. (2020). Interaction in collaborative writing between international and domestic students in an Indonesian university. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(1), 113-128.

Shehadeh, A. (2011). Effects and student perceptions of collaborative writing in L2. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(4), 286-305.

Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for collaborative knowledge building. MIT Press.

Storch, N. (2001). How collaborative is pair work? ESL tertiary students composing in pairs. Language Teaching Research, 5(1), 29-53.

Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 153-173.

Storch, N. (2008). Metatalk in a pair work activity: Level of engagement and implications for language development. Language Awareness, 17(2), 95-114.

Storch, N. (2013). Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms. Multilingual Matters.

Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G. (2007). Writing tasks: The effects of collaboration. In M. D. P. Garcia Mayo (Ed.). Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 157-177). Multilingual Matters.

Suwantarathip, O., & Wichadee, S. (2014). The effects of collaborative writing activity using Google Docs on students’ writing abilities. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(2), 148-156.

Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. Lantolf (Ed.). Sociocultural theory and second language learning (97-114). Oxford University Press.

Swain, M. (2006). Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language learning. In H. Byrnes (Ed.). Advanced Language Learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp 95-108). Continuum.

Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 297-298.

Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2002). Talking it through: Two French immersion learners’ response to reformulation. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(3-4), 285-304.

Traphagan, T., Kucsera, J. V., & Kishi, K. (2010). Impact of class lecture webcasting on attendance and learning. Educational technology research and development, 58(1), 19-37.

Ubaldo, E. F. (2020). Collaborative writing in an online synchronous mode: comparing L2 learners’ interactions, texts, and co-authoring experiences in pairs and groups [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Memphis.

Ubaldo, E. F., & Adams, R. (2020, October 23-25). Pairs vs small groups: Accuracy and complexity of written texts in online synchronous collaborative writing [Paper presentation]. Virtual Second Language Research Forum 2020, Vanderbilt University, Tennessee, USA.

Vygotsky, L. (Ed.). (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Yu, S., Lee, I., & Mak, P. (2016). Revisiting Chinese cultural issues in peer feedback in EFL writing: Insights from a multiple case study. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(2), 295-304.

Zeng, G., & Takatsuka, S. (2009). Text-based peer-peer collaborative dialogue in a computer-mediated learning environment in the EFL context. System, 37(3), 434-446.

Zhou, W., Simpson, E., & Domizi, D. P. (2012). Google Docs in an out-of-class collaborative writing activity. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 24(3), 359 375.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Print ISSN: 2355-2794, Online ISSN: 2461-0275

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.