Rhetorical structure in the problem statement section of Iranian postgraduate students' research projects

Zahra Tarvirdizdeh, Vahid Nimehchisalem


This paper reports the results of a study that investigated the structure of the Problem Statement (PS) section, following Swales’ (1990) Create-A-Research-Space (CARS) model as the first objective. Move analysis was used to analyze the rhetorical moves of the PS sections of the research projects. The second objective was the identification of the specific types of linguistic features associated with each move and step based on Pho’s (2013) classification. Following Pho (2013), the linguistic features as important signals of moves were identified.  For this purpose, 30 research projects written by Iranian master’s students were purposively selected. The findings showed that the obligatory moves were Moves 1 ‘Establishing a Territory’ and 2 ‘Establishing a Niche’. All moves and steps were identified linguistically although their sequence and arrangement were not the same as what was anticipated by the model. Although the cyclic and embedded moves were defined in the rhetorical structure of the PSs, most of them were anomalous or ill-structured. The study has theoretical contributions, the most significant one of which is that the CARS model is applicable to define and analyze the rhetorical structure of the PS section.


genre analysis; problem statement; rhetorical structure; Swales’ CARS model

Full Text:



Afshar, H. S. & Ranjbar, A. (2017). A comparative study of rhetorical moves adopted in research questions and method sections of applied linguistics research articles. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 8(1), 46–71. https://doi.org/10.22055/rals.2017.12612

Bhatia, V. K. (1996). Methodological issues in genre analysis. HERMES-Journal of Language and Communication in Business, 9(16), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.v9i16.25383

Connor, U. M. (1996). Contrastive rhetoric: Cross-cultural aspects of second language writing. Cambridge University Press.

Creswell, J. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson.

Creswell, J. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Pearson.

Crookes, G. (1986). Towards a validated analysis of scientific text structure. Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/7.1.57

Crookes, G. (1990). The utterance, and other basic units for second language discourse analysis. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 183 199. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.183

Devitt, A. J. (2015). Genre performances: John Swales’ genre analysis and rhetorical-linguistic genre studies. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 19, 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.05.008

Dudley-Evans, T. (2000). Genre analysis: A key to a theory of ESP? Iberica, 2, 3-11. http://www.aelfe.org/documents/text2-Dudley.pdf

Fazilatfar, A. M. & Naseri, Z. S. (2014). Rhetorical moves in applied linguistics articles and their corresponding Iranian writer identity. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 489–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.444

Geçıklı, M. (2013). A genre-analysis study on the rhetorical organization of English and Turkish PhD theses in the field of English Language Teaching research assistant of English Language Teaching. International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology, 3(6), 50–58.

Gol, A. K., & Rashid, N. H. M. (2013). The most difficult areas in English writing: A study on Iranian and Malaysian students’ and teachers’ perception. Iranian EFL Journal, 9(5), 100–116.

Hyland, K. (2002). Teaching and researching writing. Pearson Education.

Hyland, K. (2004). Genre and second language writing. University of Michigan Press.

Hyland, K. (2007a). English for specific purposes. In J. Cummins & C. Davison (Eds.), Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 15 (pp. 391-402). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-46301-8_28

Hyland, K. (2007b). Genre pedagogy: Language, literacy and L2 writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(3), 148–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.07.005

Ibrahim, N., & Nambiar, R. M. K. (2011). What is the problem with the statement of problem? The case of postgraduate international students and the introductory sections of a project paper. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1713–1717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.356

Jalilifar, A., Firuzmand, S., & Roshani, S. (2011). Genre analysis of problem statement sections of MA proposals and theses in Applied Linguistics. Language, Society and Culture, (2011)33, 85–93.

Kanoksilapatham, B. (2015). Distinguishing textual features characterizing structural variation in research articles across three engineering sub-discipline corpora. English for Specific Purposes, 37, 74–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.06.008

Karimnia, A. (2013). Writing research articles in English: Insights from Iranian university teachers’ of TEFL. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 901–914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.137

Kellogg, R. T. (2006). Professional writing expertise. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 389–402). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816796.022

Khodabandeh, F. (2014). Argumentation across L1 and L2: Examination of three instructional treatments of genre-based approach to teaching writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 968–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.506

Kumar, R. (2010). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners (3rd ed.). Sage.

Levy, Y., & Ellis, T. J. (2006). A systems approach to conduct an effective literature review in support of information systems research. Informing Science Journal, 9, 181-212. https://doi.org/10.28945/479

Loi, C. K., & Evans, M. S. (2010). Cultural differences in the organization of research article introductions from the field of educational psychology: English and Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(10), 2814–2825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.03.010

Metoyer-Duran, C., & Hernon, P. (1994). Problem statements in research proposals and published research: A case study of researchers’ viewpoints. Library and Information Science Research, 16(2), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/0740-8188(94)90003-5

Namvar, F., Nor, N. F. M., Ibrahim, N., & Mustafa, J. (2012). Analysis of collocations in the Iranian postgraduate students’ writings. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 18(1), 11–22.

Nenty, H. J. (2009). Writing a quantitative research thesis. International Journal of Educational Science, 1(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/09751122.2009.11889972

Ozturk, I. (2007). The textual organisation of research article introductions in applied linguistics: Variability within a single discipline. English for Specific Purposes, 26(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.12.003

Pho, P. D. (2013). Authorial stance in research articles: Examples from applied linguistics and educational technology. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137032782

Rizki, I., Usman, B., Samad, I. A., Muslim, A., & Mahmud, M. (2019). Rhetorical pattern of political advertisement in Aceh. Studies in English Language and Education, 6(2), 212–227. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v6i2.13851

Salmani-Nodoushan, M. A. (2020). English for Specific Purposes: Traditions, trends, directions. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(1), 247–268. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i1.16342

Samraj, B. (2008). A discourse analysis of master’s theses across disciplines with a focus on introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.02.005

Samraj, B., & Gawron, J. M. (2015). The suicide note as a genre: Implications for genre theory. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 19, 88–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.04.006

Sheldon, E. (2011). Rhetorical differences in RA introductions written by English L1 and L2 and Castilian Spanish L1 writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10(4), 238–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.08.004

Sheldon, E. (2013). The research article: A rhetorical and functional comparison of texts created by native and non-native English writers and native Spanish writers [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of New South Wales.

Swales, J. M. (1981). Aspects of article introductions. The University of Michigan Press.

Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.

Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Exploration and applications. Cambridge University Press.

Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (1994). Academic writing for graduate students: A course for nonnative speakers of English. Ann Harbor.

Tamela, E. (2020). Move structure analysis on research article abstracts in national and international SCOPUS indexed journals. Proceedings of the International Conference on English Language Teaching (ICONELT 2019) (pp. 12-17). Atlantis Press.

Validi, M., Jalilifar, A., Shooshtari, Z. G., & Hayati, A. (2016). Medical research article introductions in Persian and English contexts: Rhetorical and metadiscoursal differences. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 73–98. https://doi.org/10.22055/rals.2016.12095

Varghese, S. A., & Abraham, S. A. (1998). Undergraduates arguing a case. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 287-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(98)90018-2

Yasin, B., & Qamariah, H. (2014). The application of Swales’ Model in writing a research article introduction. Studies in English Language and Education, 1(1), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v1i1.1118

Zappen, J. P. (1983). A rhetoric for research in sciences and technologies. Routledge.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v8i2.19118


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Print ISSN: 2355-2794, Online ISSN: 2461-0275

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.