Exploring interpersonal meanings on the discourse of the Indonesian national anthem from the CDA perspectives

Ribut Surjowati

Abstract


This research is aimed at describing how the composer of Indonesia Raya (IR) construed and negotiated interpersonal meanings which represent his ideology to the Indonesians. The data in this qualitative study was the text of IR which is ideologically contested. The study analyzed the lexicogrammar properties dealing with words and structures and production processes. The data were collected by the researcher as the research instrument by using a documentation technique. The procedures of data analysis were conducted following the stages of Fairclough’s Critical Discourse Analysis framework (1989), including micro analysis concerning lexical features in the text, meso analysis concerning the process production and interpretation of the text, and macro analysis concerning ideological effects and hegemonic processes in which discourse participates. The attitude system of appraisal was analyzed based on that proposed by Martin and White (2005), and Martin and Rose (2003). The results showed that from the affect viewpoint, the IR composer is seen as an educated young man who witnessed people suffer and did not only express his feeling of joy with the coming independence of Indonesia and the gratefulness, but also the insecurity and anxiety with the possibility of other forms of colonialism. Meanwhile, from the appreciation viewpoint, Indonesia is described as a noble, heredity, sacred, and magical land. Not only is it an expression of his admiration and love, but also it is a warning to maintain his emotional intimacy with the nation. The judgment subcategory illustrated that the Indonesians were mostly emotionally weak. The composer encouraged the Indonesian people to unite for a greater Indonesia.  

 


Keywords


affect; appreciation; judgment; Indonesia Raya; interpersonal meaning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abril, C. R. (2007). Functions of a national anthem in society and education: A sociocultural perspective. Bulletin of the Council for research in Music Education, 172, 69-87.

Amenorvi, C. R., & Grumah, G. Y. (2019). A thematic analysis of the national anthems of English West Africa. The Journal of Applied Linguistics and Applied Literature: Dynamics and Advances, 7(1), 141-151.

Bill, P. (2012). Colonial memory and forgetting in the Netherlands and Indonesia. Journal of Genocide Research, 14(3-4), 441-461.

Brown, C. (2003). A short history of Indonesia: The unlikely nation? Allen & Unwin.

Butt, D., Fahey, R., & Feez, S. (2000). Using functional grammar: An explorer’s guide. National Centre for English Language teaching and Research.

Cerulo, K. A. (1989). Sociopolitical control and the structure of national symbols: An empirical analysis of national anthems. Social Forces, 68(1), 76-79.

Droga, L., & Humphrey, S. (2002). Getting started with functional grammar. Target Texts.

Erden, Y. (2019). National anthems as unifying tools: A comparative analysis of selected western national anthems. Eurasian Journal of English Language and Literature, 12, 44-50.

Erickson, F. (2005) Culture in society and educational practices. In J. A. Banks & C. McGee (Eds.), Multicultural education: Issues and perspective. Wiley Publications.

Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power: Discourse and power. Longman.

Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Polity Press.

Fairclough, N., Mulderrig, J., & Wodak, R. (1997) Critical discourse analysis. In T. A. Van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse studies: A Multidisciplinary introduction (2nd ed.) (pp. 357-378). Sage.

Fairclough, N., & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In T. Van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction (2nd ed.) (pp. 258-284). Sage.

Gilboa, A., & Bodner, E. (2009). What are your thoughts when the national anthem is playing? An empirical exploration. Psychology of Music, 37(4), 495-484.

Guy, N. (2002). Republic of China national anthem on Taiwan, one anthem, one performance, multiple realities. Ethnomusicology, 46, 96-119.

Hailong, T. (2006). Critical perspective on discourse studies: From critical linguistics to critical discourse analysis. Shandong Foreign Language Teaching Journal, 2, 40-47.

Hall, S. (1996). The problem of ideology: Marxism without guarantee. In D. Morley and K. H. Chen (Eds.), Critical dialogue in cultural studies (pp. 28-44). Routledge.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. Hodder and Stoughton.

Hummel, D. (2017). Banal nationalism, national anthems and peace. Journal of Social Justice, 29, 225-230.

Hutabarat, A. C. (2001). Wage Rudolf Soepratman. PT BPK Gunung Mulia.

Koller, V. (2012). How to analyze collective identity in discourse – Textual and conceptual parameters. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines, 5(2), 19-38.

Luckett, K. M., & Chick, J. K. (1998). Linguistics description in the service of history. South African Journal of Linguistics, 16(3), 81-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/10118063.1998.9724141

Martin, J. R. (1997). Analysing genre: Functional parameters. In K. Christie & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Genre and institution: Social processes in the workplace and school (pp. 30-39). Cassell.

Martin., J. R. (2000). Beyond exchange: Appraisal system in English. In S. Hunston & G. Thomson (Eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse (pp. 143-165). Oxford University Press.

Martin, J. R. (2001). Language, register, and genre. In A. Burns & C. Coffin (Eds.), Analysing English in a global context: A reader (pp. 149-166). Routledge.

Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2003). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. Continuum.

Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Palgrave.

Matthiessen, C., & Halliday, M. (1997). Systemic functional grammar: A first step into the theory. Pinter Publishers.

Merriam, A. (1964). The anthropology of music. University Press.

Meyer, M. (2001). Between theory, method, and politics: Positioning of the approaches of CDA. In R. Wodak, & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 14-32). Sage Publications.

Oktar, L. (2001). The ideological organisation of representational processes in the presentation of us and them. Discourse & Society, 12(3), 313-346.

Onditi, F. (2018). African national anthems: Their value system and normative ‘potential’. African Study Monograph, 36, 3-20.

Parkinson, J. (2011). Review of the book From language to multimodality: New developments in the study of ideational meaning, by E. Ventola & C. Jones. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 34(3), 355-358. https://benjamins.com/catalog/aral.34.3.08par/fulltext/aral.34.3.08par.pdf

Perry, M. (2000). National anthems: A call to arms. Dickinson. http://users.dickinson.edu/~history/product/perry/national_anthem.html

Scholten, E. L. (1994). Dutch expansion in the Indonesia Archipelago around 1900 and imperialism debate. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 25(1), 91-111.

Singh, D. (2017). Constitutional duty to show respect to national anthem: A legislative and judicial response. International Journal of Law, 3(4), 78-83.

Souza, A. A. (2006, July 10-15). The construal of interpersonal meanings in the discourse of national anthems: An appraisal analysis [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 33rd International Systemic Functional Congress, Sao Paulo, Brazil. https://www.pucsp.br/isfc/proceedings/Artigos%20pdf/25im_souza_531a550.pdf

Sularto, B. (2012). Wage Rudolf Supratman. Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Direktorat Jenderal Kebudayaan Direktorat Sejarah dan Nilai Budaya.

Svensson, T. (2001). The impossibility of liberalism and democracy in Indonesia 1840-1940. Nordic Institute of Asian Studies (NIAS) Publication.

Toader-Williams, A. (2017). National identity and symbols: Hidden aspects of USA, European Union, French, Hungarian and Romanian national anthems. L’Harmattan.

Triana, H. W., Wirman, E. P., Kustati, M., Reflinaldi, R., Rahmi, A., & Nelmawarni N. (2020). Social practice on Facebook: Critical discourse analysis in the process of text production. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(1), 1-21.

Van Dijk, T. A. (1995a). Discourse analysis as ideology analysis. In A. Weden & C. Schaffner (Eds.). Language and pace (pp. 17-33). Dartmouth Publishing.

Van Dijk, T. A. (1995b). Discourse semantics and ideology. Discourse & Society, 6(2), 243-289.

Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. Sage.

Van Dijk, T. A. (2000). Ideology and discourse: A multidisciplinary introduction. Pompeu Fabra University Press.

Voros, V., & Fekete, S. (2012). Word use and content analysis of six national anthems: Preliminary findings of a comparative cultural suicide research. European Psychiatry. 27(1), 82-85.

Voros, V., Osvath, P., Vincze, O., Pusztay, K., Fekete, S., & Rihmer, Z. (2016). Word use and content analysis of the first verses of six national anthems: A transcultural aspect of suicidal behavior. Psychiatria Danubina, 28(1), 82-85.

Winstone, N., & Witherspoon, K. (2015). ‘It’s all about our great queen’: The British national anthem and national identity in 8-10-year-old. Psychology of Music, 44(2), 263-277.

Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2006). Methods of discourse analysis (3rd ed.). Sage Publication.

Young, L., & Harrison, C. (2004). Systemic functional linguistics and critical discourse analysis. Continuum.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v8i1.17439

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Print ISSN: 2355-2794, Online ISSN: 2461-0275

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.