Determinants of Effective E-Procurement System: Empirical Evidence from Indonesian Local Governments

Dhiona Ayu Nani, Syaiful Ali

Abstract


This study investigates the effect of the strategy-technology-organization-people-environment (STOPE) variables on the effectiveness of e-procurement implementation in improving accountability, transparency, efficiency, and effectiveness of local governments in Indonesia. The population of this study is local government procurement services (or LPSE) in Indonesia. The sample, 96 LPSE, was selected using simple random sampling method. The data was collected through questionnaires distributed via email to 289 LPSE. The respondents were 33 managers and 63 information technology professionals of local government procurement services (33% response rate). Partial least squares (PLS) was used to analyze the data and test the hypotheses. The findings showed that strategies, objectives, integration between organizations and systems, and human resource assistance can improve the accountability, transparency, efficiency, and effectiveness of the government in implementing procurement activities

Keywords


STOPE, e-procurement, accountability, transparency, efficiency, effectiveness.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmad, T., Aljafari, R., & Venkatesh, V. (2019). The government of Jamaica’s electronic procurement system: experiences and lessons learned. Internet Research, 29(6), 1571–1588.

Al-Osaimi, K., Alheraish, A., & Bakry, S. H. (2008). STOPE-based approach for e-readiness assessment case studies. International Journal of Network Management, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/nem.657

AlHogail, A., & Mirza, A. (2014). A proposal of an organizational information security culture framework (ICTS). Proceedings of International Conference on Information, Communication Technology, and System, 243–250.

Ali, S., & Green, P. (2007). IT governance mechanisms in public sector organisations: An australian context. Journal of Global Information Management, 15(4), 41–63. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-138-4.ch023

Baker, J. (2012). Information systems theory: Explaining and predicting our digital society. In In Integrated Series in Information Systems. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6108-2%0A

Bakry, S. H. (2004). Development of e-government: A STOPE view. International Journal of Network Management, 14(5), 339–350. https://doi.org/10.1002/nem.529

Bromberg, D., & Manoharan, A. (2015). E-procurement implementation in the United States: Understanding progress in local government. Public Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 360–392.

Choi, H., Park, M. J., Rho, J. J., & Zo, H. (2016). Rethinking the assessment of e-government implementation in developing countries from the perspective of the design–reality gap: Applications in the Indonesian e-procurement system. Telecommunications Policy, 40(7), 644–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2016.03.002

Costa, A A, Arantes, A., & Valadares Tavares, L. (2013). Evidence of the impacts of public e-procurement: The Portuguese experience. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 19(4), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2013.07.004

Costa, António Aguiar, & Tavares, L. V. (2014). Social e-business as support for construction e-procurement: E-procurement network dynamics. Automation in Construction, 43, 180–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.03.019

Croom, S., & Brandon-Jones, A. (2005). Keyissues in e-Procurement: procurement implementation and operation in the public sector. Journal of Public Procurement, 5(3), 367–387. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315092539-24

Denison, D. R., & Mishra, A. K. (1995). Toward a theory of organizational culture and effectiveness. Organization Science, 6(2), 204–223.

Engström, A., Wallström, Å., & Salehi-Sangari, E. (2009). Implementation of public e-procurement in Swedish government entities. Proceedings of the International Multiconference on Computer Science and Information Technology IMCSIT ’09.

Frimpong, J. M., Andoh-baidoo, F. K., & Asamoah, D. (2020). The association between institutional absorptive capacity, electronic procurement assimilation and procurement process in public sector organizations. Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences | 2020, 3, 2208–2217.

Gebauer, J, & Shaw, M. J. (2004). Success factors and impacts of mobile business applications: Results from a mobile e-procurement study https://doi.org/. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 8(3), 19–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2004.11044304

Gorrell, G., Ford, N., Madden, A., Holdridge, P., & Eaglestone, B. (2011). Countering method bias in questionnaire-based user studies. Journal of Documentation, 67(3), 507–524. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220411111124569

Groves, R. M. (2006). Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70(5), 646–675.

Gunasekaran, A., & Ngai, E. W. T. (2008). Adoption of e-procurement in Hong Kong: An empirical research. International Journal of Production Economics, 113(1), 159–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.04.012

Hair, J. J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.

Harris, J., Anderson, J., & Shafron, W. (2000). Investment in energy efficiency: a survey of Australian firms. Energy Policy, 28(12), 867–876.

Hermana, B, & Silfianti, W. (2011). Evaluating e-government implementation by local government: the digital divide in internet-based public services in Indonesia. International Journal of Business and Social, 2(3), 156–164. http://ijbssnet.com/journals/Vol._2_No._3_[Special_Issue_-_January_2011]/18.pdf

Hermana, Budi, & Silfianti, W. (2011). Evaluating e-government implementation by local government: digital divide in internet based public services in Indonesia. International Journal of Business and Social …, 2(3), 156–164.

Hossain, M. A., Rana, N., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2015). Data research: Insights from existing literature and a research agenda. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 26(1). https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1080/10919392.2015.1124007

Jaatun, M. G., Pearson, S., Gittler, F., Leenes, R., & Niezen, M. (2016). Enhancing accountability in the cloud. International Journal of Information Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.03.004

Jain, M., Abidi, N., & Bandyopadhayay, A. (2018). E-procurement espousal and assessment framework: A case-based study of Indian automobile companies. International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development, 17(1), 87–109. https://doi.org/10.1386/tmsd.17.1.87_1

Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. (2017). Suap, perkara korupsi terbesar di Indonesia. Databoks. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2017/06/16/suap-perkara-korupsi-terbesar-di-indonesia

Mcivor, R., Mchugh, M., & Cadden, C. (2002). Internet technologies: Supporting transparency in the public sector. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 15(3), 170–187. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550210423352

Ministry of Finance’s Financial Education and Training Agency. (2014). Report kajian pengadaan barang dan jasa.

Nurmandi, A., & Kim, S. (2015). Making e-procurement work in a decentralized procurement system: A comparison of three Indonesian cities. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 28(3), 198–220. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-03-2015-0035

Pashev, K. (2011). Corruption and accession: Evidence from public procurement in Bulgaria. Public Management Review, 13(1), 409–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2011.553270

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879

Reis, P. R. D. C., & Cabral, S. (2018). Beyond contracted prices: Determinants of agility in government electronic procurement. Revista de Administracao Publica, 52(1), 107–125. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7612164442

Peraturan presiden tentng pengadaan barang/jasa pemerintah, 1 (2010).

Peraturan presiden republik indonesia nomor 16 tahun 2018, (2018).

Rokhman, A. (2011). E-Government adoption in developing countries; the case of Indonesia. Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences, 2(5), 228–236. http://oru.summon.serialssolutions.com

Rokhman, Ali. (2011). E-Government Adoption in Developing Countries; the Case of Indonesia. Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences, 2(5), 228–236.

Rotchanakitumnuai, S. (2013). The governance evidence of e-government procurement. Transforming Government: People, Process, and Policy, 7(3), 309–321. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-01-2013-0004

Saleh, M. S., Alrabiah, A., & Bakry, S. H. (2007). Using ISO 17799: 2005 information security management: A STOPE view with six sigma approach. International Journal of Network Management, 17(1), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1002/nem.616

Seo, D. B., Tan, C. W., & Warman, G. (2018). Vendor satisfaction of E-government procurement systems in developing countries: an empirical research in Indonesia. Information Technology for Development, 24(3), 554–581. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2018.1454878

Soong, K., Ahmed, E. M., & Tan, K. S. (2019). Factors influencing Malaysian small and medium enterprises adoption of electronic government procurement. Journal of Public Procurement, 20(1), 38–61.

Statista.com. (2018). World e-government leaders based on e-government development index (EGDI) in 2018 (index rating). Statista.Com. https://www.statista.com/statistics/421580/egdi-e-government-development-index-ranking/

Susanto, H., Muhaya, F. Bin, Almunawar, M. N., & Tuan, Y. C. (2010). Refinement of strategy and technology domains STOPE view on ISO 27001. In PMC for IT Security Technologies.

Walker, H., & Harland, C. (2008). E-procurement in the United Nations: Influences, issues and impact. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 28(9), 831–857. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570810895276

Wang, C., & Li, X. (2014). Centralizing public procurement in China: Task environment and organizational structure. Public Management Review,=, 16(6), 900–921. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.770056




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/jdab.v7i1.15671

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Published by:

Accounting Department supported by IAI KAPd Wilayah Aceh
Faculty of Business and Economics
Syiah Kuala University
Kopelma Darussalam, Banda Aceh, Indonesia - 23111
ISSN: 2355-9462, E-ISSN: 2528-1143

 

Creative Commons License
Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi dan Bisnis by Prodi Akuntansi Universitas Syiah Kuala is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://www.jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/JDAB/index.