Pemilihan Auditor Spesialis Industri, Kepemilikan Institusional dan Utang Perusahaan di Pasar Modal Indonesia

Indriati Adiwangsa, Mariska Regina, Athalia Ariati Hidayat, Retno Yuliati


Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji pengaruh kepemilikan institusional dan utang perusahaan terhadap kemungkinan pemilihan auditor spesialis industri. Sampel penelitian ini adalah 164 perusahaan  yang diaudit oleh Big 4 dan terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) dari tahun 2012 hingga 2016. Terdapat 733 observasi pada penelitian ini dan data dianalisis dengan menggunakan OLS pooled regression and regressi logistik. Hasil penelitian mengkonfirmasi pengaruh positif dan signifikan kepemilikan institusional terhadap pemilihan auditor spesialis industry, namun tidak mendapatkan bukti empiris pengaruh utang perusahaan terhadap pemilihan auditor spesialis industri. 

Full Text:



Abdullah, W., Zanani, W., Ismail, I., & Jamaluddin, N. (2008). The impact of board composition, ownership and CEO duality on audit quality: the Malaysian evidence. Malaysian Accounting Review, 7(2), 17–28.

Alfraih, M. M. (2017). Does ownership structure affect the quality of auditor pair composition? Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 15(2), 245–263.

Almutairi, A. R. (2013). The impact of institutional ownership and corporate debt on audit quality. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 29(2), 134–152.

Almutairi, A. R., Dunn, K. A., & Skantz, T. (2009). Auditor tenure, auditor specialization, and information asymmetry. Managerial Auditing Journal, 24(7), 600–623.

Anggraeni, O. L. (2016). Pengaruh struktur kepemilikan dan mekanisme tata kelola korporat terhadap pemilihan auditor eksternal berkualitas. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa FEB, 4(1).

Azibi, J., Azibi, H., & Tondeur, H. (2017). Institutional activism, auditor’s choice and earning management after the Enron collapse: Evidence from France. International Business Research, 10(2), 154–168.

Balsam, S., Krishnan, J., & Yang, J. S. (2003). Auditor industry specialization and earnings quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 22(2), 71–97.

Booth, L. D., Cleary, W. S., & Peterson Drake, P. (2014). Corporate finance: Financial management in a global environment. Hoboken, N.J: John Wiley & Sons.

Broye, G., & Weill, L. (2008). Does leverage influence auditor choice? A cross-country analysis. Applied Financial Economics, 18(9), 715–731.

Burns, N., Kedia, S., & Lipson, M. (2010). Institutional ownership and monitoring: Evidence from financial misreporting. Journal of Corporate Finance, 16(4), 443–455.

Bushee, B. J. (1998). The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior. Accounting Review, 305–333.

Chen, C., Lin, C., & Lin, Y. (2008). Audit partner tenure, audit firm tenure, and discretionary accruals: Does long auditor tenure impair earnings quality? Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(2), 415–445.

Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39–67.

Craswell, A. T., Francis, J. R., & Taylor, S. L. (1995). Auditor brand name reputations and industry specializations. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 20(3), 297–322.

DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183–199.

DeFond, M. L., Francis, J. R., & Wong, T. J. (2000). Auditor industry specialization and market segmentation: Evidence from Hong Kong. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 19(1), 49–66.

DeFond, M. L., & Jiambalvo, J. (1994). Debt covenant violation and manipulation of accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 17(1–2), 145–176.

Dunn, K. A., & Mayhew, B. W. (2004). Audit firm industry specialization and client disclosure quality. Review of Accounting Studies, 9(1), 35–58.

Dunn, K. A., Tan, C. EL, & Venuti, E. K. (2002). Audit firm characteristics and type II errors in the going concern opinion. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 9(1), 39–69.

Graves, S. B., & Waddock, S. A. (1990). Institutional ownership and control: Implications for long-term corporate strategy. The Executive, 4(1), 75–83.

Haka, S., & Chalos, P. (1990). Evidence of agency conflict among management, auditors, and the audit committee chair. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 9(4), 271–292.

Hessayri, M., & Saihi, M. (2015). Monitoring earnings management in emerging markets: IFRS adoption and ownership structure. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 31(2), 86–108.

Ikbel, M., Kolsi, M. C., & Affes, H. (2012). The impact of corporate governance mechanisms on audit quality: Evidence from Tunisia. The IUP Journal of Corporate Governance, XI(3), 48–70.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.

Joshi, S., Krishnan, R., & Lave, L. (2001). Estimating the Hidden Costs of Environmental Regulation. The Accounting Review, 76(2), 171–198.

Kane, G. D., & Velury, U. (2004a). The role of institutional ownership in the market for auditing services: an empirical investigation. Journal of Business Research, 57(9), 976–983.

Kane, G. D., & Velury, U. (2004b). The role of institutional ownership in the market for auditing services: an empirical investigation. Journal of Business Research, 57(9), 976–983.

Khasharmeh, H., & Joseph, N. (2017). Does ownership structure affects audit quality: Evidence from Bahrain ? Global Journal o Accounting, Economics and Finance, 4(3), 92–100.

Knechel, W. R., Niemi, L., & Sundgren, S. (2008). Determinants of auditor choice: Evidence from a small client market. International Journal of Auditing, 12(1), 65–88.

La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), 1113–1155.

Neal, T. L., & Riley, J. R. R. (2004). Auditor industry specialist research design. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 23(2), 169–177.

Palmer, P. D. (2008). Audit quality and financial report disclosures. Flinders Business School Research Paper Serie (Vol. 1).

Pangaribuan, H., & Pranata, D. (2016). Ownership, company size and audit quality in Indonesia banking industry: An empirical evidence during the relatively stable economic condition. Journal of International Scholars Conference - BUSINESS & GOVERNANCE, 1(3), 57–65.

Press, E. G., & Weintrop, J. B. (1990). Accounting-based constraints in public and private debt agreements: Their association with leverage and impact on accounting choice. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 12(1–3), 65–95.

Rankin, M., Stanton, P., McGowan, S., Ferlauto, K., & Tilling, M. (2012). Contemporary issues in accounting (1st ed.). Milton Qld: Wiley.

Setiawan, A. S., & Karsana, Y. W. (2015). Faktor representasi stock holder dan debt holder berpengaruh terhadap keputusan pemilihan auditor berkualitas (studi empiris pada perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di bursa efek Indonesia). Universitas Tarumanagara Journal of Accounting, 19(3).

Spence, M. (2002). Signaling in retrospect and the informational structure of markets. American Economic Review, 92(3), 434–459. Retrieved from

Suyono, E. (2015). Reaksi investor terhadap pemilihan auditor spesialis industri pada perusahaan keluarga di bursa efek indonesia. Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 19(1), 1–15.

Velury, U., Reisch, J. T., & O’reilly, D. M. (2003). Institutional ownership and the selection of industry specialist auditors. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 21(1), 35–48.

Wahab, E. A. A., Zain, M. M., James, K., & Haron, H. (2009).

Institutional investors, political connection and audit quality in Malaysia. Accounting Research Journal, 22(2), 167–195.

Watts, R. L. (1977). Corporate financial statements, a product of the market and political processes. Australian Journal of Management, 2(1), 53–75.

Wirjono, E. R. (2017). Kepemilikan institusional sebagai pemonitor manajemen laba melalui pemilihan auditor berkualitas. KINERJA, 9(2), 87–97.

Zureigat, Q. M. (2011). The effect of ownership structure on audit quality: Evidence from Jordan. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(10).



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2019 Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi dan Bisnis

Published by:

Accounting Department incorperated with IAI KAPd Wilayah Aceh
Economics and Business Faculty
Syiah Kuala University
Kopelma Darussalam, Banda Aceh, Indonesia - 23111
ISSN: 2355-9462, E-ISSN: 2528-1143


Creative Commons License
Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi dan Bisnis by Prodi Akuntansi Universitas Syiah Kuala is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at